As successful as vaping has been in the United Kingdom, it is generally accepted that more has to be done to reach out to the remaining 6.5 million current smokers. While some believe we should be pushing vape products more, the group of academics from the University of Bristol, University College London, and the University of Cambridge are concerned about vape products being too visible.
The researchers, including Marcus Munafò, found that most retailers that sell tobacco, albeit out of view, had prominent displays of e-cigarettes.
Tobacco products displays at the point-of-sale in retail stores are banned – but ecig displays are not. They describe this situation as “a problem”.
“The extent of this potential problem is unknown because the visibility and placement of e-cigarette and smoking paraphernalia point of sale displays has not been described in detail,” they write.
The team of researchers say they aimed to address this gap to inform future research by examining the impact of e-cigarette point-of-sale displays on tobacco smoking, particularly in children, as well as differences in visibility according to area of deprivation.
They visited 166 stores in Bristol and Cambridge, “of which 133 sold the relevant products and agreed to take part. These included small and large format stores of four supermarket chains and a randomly selected sample of convenience stores.”
The team utilised a standardised checklist to create a total visibility score for point of sale displays of e-cigarettes that were encountered, while other measures of visibility and placement were also captured.
Their results showed that both e-cigarette and smoking paraphernalia point of sale displays were present in 96% of stores. These point-of-sale displays were highly visible across all stores with an average visibility score of 14.7 out of 17 for e-cigarettes on the checklist.
Analysis of the results also revealed that the use of multiple display units was more common for e-cigarettes (53%) than for smoking paraphernalia (12%). Signage was present in most stores (62%) for e-cigarettes.
Visible pricing was present in most stores (70%) for e-cigarettes.
Most stores had smaller e-cigarette (74%) displays than their tobacco storage unit, and 49% were positioned next to it.
Just over half (53%) of stores had some form of promotional material for e-cigarettes, with the most common types involving price (23%), ease of use (15%), and flavours (14%).
The team found no link between type of display and the deprivation status of the store's location.
They concluded: “E-cigarette … POS displays are near ubiquitous and highly visible in supermarkets and convenience stores in two cities in England. The impact of these displays on tobacco smoking in children and adults is unknown, meriting urgent research to assess their effect on susceptibility to tobacco smoking in children.”
Given the extensive research demonstrating that there is no significant issue with teen vaping, that teen vaping is declining, and that teen smoking rates continue to decline, it is difficult to understand the point of their study or why they appear to labour under a misapprehension that further “urgent research” is required.
News from:https://www.planetofthevapes.co.uk/news/vaping-news/2021-09-22_academics-attack-shopkeepers.html